Zestful Blog Post #136
The most recent two issues of Writer’s Digest magazine
include articles by me. November/December contains “Make a New Commitment to
Your Writing,” which has moved more readers to get in touch with me, either via
email or social media, than any other piece I’ve written for the magazine in
the ten years I’ve been doing it. The article is a bouquet of encouragement,
drawn from my insights, woes, and successes. From the response, I realize that
while writers can always use help with technique, they thirst as much or more
for help with heart and guts. Here’s one of my favorite passages from the article:
Rekindle the spark by simply moving
full-on into the unknown. Whatever you doubt you can do on the page, choose
that thing. In our increasingly cautious world, “For the hell of it,” has too
often been replaced by “Better not.” It’s up to artists—that is, you—to throw
away caution and leap. You might attain remarkable new heights.
I want to keep helping writers this way.
[For the hell of it: trying to fit into a mockup of
the Mercury capsule at NASA. Real dimensions. The Mercury 7 astronauts all were
shorter than me. The thing is terrifyingly tiny. This is the best I could do
for an illustration for this post.]
The January issue features a more workmanlike piece: “Power
Tools,” which shows how to use arc and pace to fix just about any problem in
fiction writing. And here’s an excerpt:
Often dialogue doesn’t work because
the author was afraid to move too fast. But fiction, almost as much as stage
drama, relies on dialogue for vigor and movement.
Arc and pace together, when
injected into dialogue, can transform it from weak to strong. In fact, a small
dialogue exchange can have a microarc all its own:
“No, because I don’t think you can
keep a secret.”
“Oh, yes I can! Try me.”
I just turned in a chapter for a new Writer’s Digest book on
dialogue, set to come out in 2016. My assignment was to write something on internal
dialogue, or the inner voices of characters. It’s funny, I’ve always
represented my characters’ thoughts intuitively, but researching and writing
the chapter made me realize how complex the whole thing can get, when you try
to nail down absolutes. For instance, is this passage in present tense or past?:
I should hold up that liquor store
tonight, he thought.
Truly, you can argue that one both ways. And truly, it doesn’t
matter! If you have a basic grasp of how it works, you can’t go far wrong. All
you really need to attend to is consistency. For instance, if you use the above
construction in a story, you should not later use something like this:
I’ve got it made now, he thinks.
Once you see it explained, you’ve got it.
What do you think? To post, click below where it says, 'No
Comments,' or '2 Comments,' or whatever.
If you'd like to receive this blog automatically as an
email, look to the right, above my bio, and subscribe there. Thanks for looking
in.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Tell us your thoughts! You know you want to.